Bookmakers v Turf TV [2008] EWHC 2688 (Ch)

High Court judgment (about 30 pages) rejecting collusion claims by Turf TV and the racecourses backing it against bookmakers. These claims were made as counterclaims in response to the action by SIS/bookmakers against Turf TV racecourses. The judge found no evidence of the alleged collective boycott of Turf TV's service, or the alleged collective refusal to sponsor races at Turf TV racecourses.

For further information or advice please contact Franck Latrémolière.

Filed under Article 81, UK courts.

Reckon LLP is an economics consultancy with expertise in data analysis, economic regulation and competition law.

About Reckon