R (Coughlan) v N&ED Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1871

Court of Appeal judgment in a dispute relating to the adequacy of a consultation process. The court (led by Lord Woolf MR) said:

108. It is common ground that, whether or not consultation of interested parties and the public is a legal requirement, if it is embarked upon it must be carried out properly. To be proper, consultation must be undertaken at a time when proposals are still at a formative stage; it must include sufficient reasons for particular proposals to allow those consulted to give intelligent consideration and an intelligent response; adequate time must be given for this purpose; and the product of consultation must be conscientiously taken into account when the ultimate decision is taken. ...

112 ... It has to be remembered that consultation is not litigation: the consulting authority is not required to publicise every submission it receives or (absent some statutory obligation) to disclose all its advice. Its obligation is to let those who have a potential interest in the subject matter know in clear terms what the proposal is and exactly why it is under positive consideration, telling them enough (which may be a good deal) to enable them to make an intelligent response. The obligation, although it may be quite onerous, goes no further than this.

For further information or advice please contact Franck Latrémolière.

Filed under Guidance, UK courts.

Reckon LLP is an economics consultancy with expertise in data analysis, economic regulation and competition law.

About Reckon